|
|
|
|
| Georadars | Russian | |
                      |
ZAO Timer develops and manufactures a series of georadars GROT since 1997. At the initial stage of ZAO Timer places orders for the production of georadars and development work at a factory in St. Petersburg. In the year 2000 ZAO Timer concluded with this company the contract for development work on the modernization and construction of ground penetrating radars, which was later called GROT-10 and GROT-11. Terms of Reference and Sketch documentation nodes kit provided by the customer - ZAO Timer. Since 2003, the same company began to produce ground penetrating radar LOZA, which is virtually copied externally GROT-10. To prevent leakage of ideas and design innovations since 2003, ZAO Timerproduces georadars GROT and the software to their own enterprise. Using a modification GROT-10, GROT-11 comparators and gating time allowed to prescribe the waveform signal by accumulating the pulse transmitter. The accuracy and resolution of the instrument depended on the number of probe pulses, and their precise timing, which leads to main limitations of this method. So, already implemented in the GROT-10 can register a signal on a linear scale required substantial costs in manufacturing (in particular, one of the competitors are only now says on the transition to a linear scale recording of waveforms). Nevertheless, for us has always been a priority final characteristics of devices and ease of operation, which determined the direction of further developments. Georadar GROT-12, developed by ZAO Timer is not only retained all the advantages of GPR series GROT, but the first time moved on significantly new approach to detect the signal in the receiver and instrument control: the processing of the reflected signal over the entire range of frequencies per pulse transmitter. This allowed us to remove the distortion inherent in the previous generation of GPR, significantly improving energy efficiency and battery life of ground penetrating radar, used for data processing more efficient mathematical methods to ensure greater accuracy of work done. For the user it is difficult to understand the structural features of a device. And the more the advantages of a-factor. We are often treated with clients Please describe the comparative advantages and disadvantages of a GPR. We advise testing on a single site. Only in this case, you will see the benefits.
|
|
|